Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D750
Sharp enough?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="robbins.photo" data-source="post: 609276" data-attributes="member: 27043"><p>Ok, keep in mind folks that there is no such thing as "no post processing" in the digital age. It just doesn't exist. If she's shooting in RAW format they have to be converted to JPG for upload. That is post processing.</p><p></p><p>If she's shooting in JPG then guess what, there is a lot of post processing going on - it's just being done by the camera rather than photoshop. The picture is being sharpened, etc - by internal algorithms built into the camera.</p><p></p><p>The notion that you shouldn't post process pictures is quite frankly ridiculous to my mind. Don't get me wrong, I'm all for getting as much right on camera as you can - but when that becomes a driving obsession you really start to lose track of what's ultimately important, that being the end result.</p><p></p><p>So yes, I post process and will continue to do so - I'll remove noise because I shoot a lot of stuff at high ISO. I don't have the luxury of carrying lighting equipment with me and in a lot of the scenarios I shoot in it would actually do more harm than good. </p><p></p><p>I agree with the previous poster, anyone who advocates for no post processing frankly is handing out the absolute worst advice imaginable. Ask any pro from back in the days of 35mm shooting, they'll tell you there was plenty of "post processing" and "fixes" being applied even back then, but when dealing with film negatives it was a more laborious process, that's all.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="robbins.photo, post: 609276, member: 27043"] Ok, keep in mind folks that there is no such thing as "no post processing" in the digital age. It just doesn't exist. If she's shooting in RAW format they have to be converted to JPG for upload. That is post processing. If she's shooting in JPG then guess what, there is a lot of post processing going on - it's just being done by the camera rather than photoshop. The picture is being sharpened, etc - by internal algorithms built into the camera. The notion that you shouldn't post process pictures is quite frankly ridiculous to my mind. Don't get me wrong, I'm all for getting as much right on camera as you can - but when that becomes a driving obsession you really start to lose track of what's ultimately important, that being the end result. So yes, I post process and will continue to do so - I'll remove noise because I shoot a lot of stuff at high ISO. I don't have the luxury of carrying lighting equipment with me and in a lot of the scenarios I shoot in it would actually do more harm than good. I agree with the previous poster, anyone who advocates for no post processing frankly is handing out the absolute worst advice imaginable. Ask any pro from back in the days of 35mm shooting, they'll tell you there was plenty of "post processing" and "fixes" being applied even back then, but when dealing with film negatives it was a more laborious process, that's all. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D750
Sharp enough?
Top
