Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Horoscope Fish" data-source="post: 609265" data-attributes="member: 13090">I would say a D600, roughly speaking. It's not easy to match Canon bodies to Nikon bodies perfectly... In short, I'd like to see the blog this woman posts. Her &quot;No Photoshop&quot; policy is based on the premise the camera gets an awful lot right without any help from post processing; things like exposure, white balance and color. And the simple fact of the matter is, the camera doesn't do that. It's a machine that captures light and that's a whole lot different than &quot;seeing&quot;. A lot of people think if you use Photoshop you're doing it to deceive, or manipulate the photo in some way so as to fool the viewer when in fact what we're doing is correcting problems in order to make the final image appear more lifelike. What I hear, when I hear people say they don't believe in post-processing is, &quot;I'm afraid of technology so instead of learning this important aspect of my art/craft, I'm going to take this false, moral highground and decry it instead of taking the time and putting forth the energy required to instead embrace it, learn it and grow as a photographer.&quot; I admit there are exceptions to what I admit now is a generalization and I'll afford those pardons as they present themselves.Once again, just my opinion.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Horoscope Fish, post: 609265, member: 13090"] I would say a D600, roughly speaking. It's not easy to match Canon bodies to Nikon bodies perfectly... In short, I'd like to see the blog this woman posts. Her "No Photoshop" policy is based on the premise the camera gets an awful lot right without any help from post processing; things like exposure, white balance and color. And the simple fact of the matter is, the camera doesn't do that. It's a machine that captures light and that's a whole lot different than "seeing". A lot of people think if you use Photoshop you're doing it to deceive, or manipulate the photo in some way so as to fool the viewer when in fact what we're doing is correcting problems in order to make the final image appear more lifelike. What I hear, when I hear people say they don't believe in post-processing is, "I'm afraid of technology so instead of learning this important aspect of my art/craft, I'm going to take this false, moral highground and decry it instead of taking the time and putting forth the energy required to instead embrace it, learn it and grow as a photographer." I admit there are exceptions to what I admit now is a generalization and I'll afford those pardons as they present themselves. Once again, just my opinion. [/QUOTE]

Verification