Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Flashes
Shanny SN600N flash overview
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="rocketman122" data-source="post: 462303" data-attributes="member: 14443"><p>yea, as much as id like to believe that a flash is a flash, it has shown me over and over that 3rd party flashes (metz 58 AF2, 565, 568) are not as accurate as the nikon flashes and its known by veteran pros that on camera its nikon, and off camera, whatever youd like. I hope this shanny does better. </p><p></p><p>theres something else happening between the nikon (body/flash) thats causing them to be more accurate. just like nikon caused some 3rd party batteries not to work with their body in a firmware update. I think there some hardware/software that lets them communicate better. </p><p></p><p>this pixel flash shows the same. the difference are small but not the same as the canon. phottix had the issue as well. overexposing by a stop and it was patched in a firmware update. </p><p><a href="http://flashhavoc.com/pixel-x800c-speedlite-review/" target="_blank">PIXEL – X800C Speedlite Review – UPDATED | FLASH HAVOC</a></p><p></p><p>btw, whats your take on the pc port on the side? maybe for a radio slave connection? weird though. no contacts on it. nice they added 2.5mm pc sync as well.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="rocketman122, post: 462303, member: 14443"] yea, as much as id like to believe that a flash is a flash, it has shown me over and over that 3rd party flashes (metz 58 AF2, 565, 568) are not as accurate as the nikon flashes and its known by veteran pros that on camera its nikon, and off camera, whatever youd like. I hope this shanny does better. theres something else happening between the nikon (body/flash) thats causing them to be more accurate. just like nikon caused some 3rd party batteries not to work with their body in a firmware update. I think there some hardware/software that lets them communicate better. this pixel flash shows the same. the difference are small but not the same as the canon. phottix had the issue as well. overexposing by a stop and it was patched in a firmware update. [URL="http://flashhavoc.com/pixel-x800c-speedlite-review/"]PIXEL – X800C Speedlite Review – UPDATED | FLASH HAVOC[/URL] btw, whats your take on the pc port on the side? maybe for a radio slave connection? weird though. no contacts on it. nice they added 2.5mm pc sync as well. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Flashes
Shanny SN600N flash overview
Top