Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="eidian" data-source="post: 303858" data-attributes="member: 14514">This is great advice and so was the suggestion about the 35mm lens in another response. I don't need FX lenses because the highest series that I plan to upgrade to is the 7xxx so DX lenses are perfect for me. But planning ahead like that saves time on the learning curve as well as money. My D3200 came with the 18-55 and 55-200 but I quickly got the 35mm 1.8 prime and Sigma 10-20 because I knew that the kit lenses weren't cutting it--not the camera. Don't want to spend an &quot;arm and a leg&quot; but want better quality pictures? Good luck with that. I see this kind of whining in the watch forums all of the time: I want a nice watch but don't want to spend more than $200. Really? OK, buy some piece of crap, quartz Invicta and hope that it's still running in two years because that's all you're paying for. Same logic goes for a lens: you get what you pay for. Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk</blockquote>

[QUOTE="eidian, post: 303858, member: 14514"] This is great advice and so was the suggestion about the 35mm lens in another response. I don't need FX lenses because the highest series that I plan to upgrade to is the 7xxx so DX lenses are perfect for me. But planning ahead like that saves time on the learning curve as well as money. My D3200 came with the 18-55 and 55-200 but I quickly got the 35mm 1.8 prime and Sigma 10-20 because I knew that the kit lenses weren't cutting it--not the camera. Don't want to spend an "arm and a leg" but want better quality pictures? Good luck with that. I see this kind of whining in the watch forums all of the time: I want a nice watch but don't want to spend more than $200. Really? OK, buy some piece of crap, quartz Invicta and hope that it's still running in two years because that's all you're paying for. Same logic goes for a lens: you get what you pay for. Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk [/QUOTE]

Verification