Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="BackdoorArts" data-source="post: 348772" data-attributes="member: 9240">To echo Dave, DX doesn't give greater DoF, it just exhibits more DoF than FX at the same equivalent focal length since you need to shoot with a wider angle lens.That said, the High ISO differences are really nitpicks between the D810 and the D600/610 - so close that I'd call it a wash.&nbsp; If you do things where you can use the reach I would say you're better off with the FX/DX combination.&nbsp; I worked with a D800 &amp; D600 for over a year before going back to the D7100 for reach because the while D800 could get me most of the way to where I needed to be, the lower frame rate and big files were a drawback when doing all that cropping in post (and in DX mode, shooting action with a partial viewfinder was more of a pain than dealing with the big files).As was asked, what do you use to make your money?&nbsp; If the reach of the D7100 earns you some of that then I highly suggest you hold onto it.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="BackdoorArts, post: 348772, member: 9240"] To echo Dave, DX doesn't give greater DoF, it just exhibits more DoF than FX at the same equivalent focal length since you need to shoot with a wider angle lens. That said, the High ISO differences are really nitpicks between the D810 and the D600/610 - so close that I'd call it a wash. If you do things where you can use the reach I would say you're better off with the FX/DX combination. I worked with a D800 & D600 for over a year before going back to the D7100 for reach because the while D800 could get me most of the way to where I needed to be, the lower frame rate and big files were a drawback when doing all that cropping in post (and in DX mode, shooting action with a partial viewfinder was more of a pain than dealing with the big files). As was asked, what do you use to make your money? If the reach of the D7100 earns you some of that then I highly suggest you hold onto it. [/QUOTE]

Verification