Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Other Stuff
Off Topic
* Scott Murray has reached 5000 posts!* 12:10 AM
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="rocketman122" data-source="post: 270799" data-attributes="member: 14443"><p>So a week is very fast I think. It takes me between 3 days and 2 weeks to deliver edited pics. how many hours did it take you and how many photos total? I will shoot anywhere from 1200-2000 pics and will <strong>heavily</strong> filter out pics to around 600 to 1000. if its a must have picture then I include, even if I think it sucks but otherwise, to the archive. if they ask for a specific photo, I might say yes, but only if really necessary, otherwise I say "no thats the ones that came out" </p><p></p><p> I dont think its fair that I get pressured (always-from clients or photographers I work for) to deliver the pics asap. and the video editors deliver the work a month later (no less) on average. it takes them 9 hours (at most) to edit a movie and me it takes no less than 6 hours for my work. I work slow and im a perfectionist. also, my eyes are very sensitive and cant do editing for more than 2 hours straight. I usually have to break it into a few sessions. so 6 hours and they want it in 3 days and vid editor works 9 hours and delivers after a month. wheres the proportion. from now on, I will tell them up to 2 weeks. I have tons of other stuff I do as well.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="rocketman122, post: 270799, member: 14443"] So a week is very fast I think. It takes me between 3 days and 2 weeks to deliver edited pics. how many hours did it take you and how many photos total? I will shoot anywhere from 1200-2000 pics and will [B]heavily[/B] filter out pics to around 600 to 1000. if its a must have picture then I include, even if I think it sucks but otherwise, to the archive. if they ask for a specific photo, I might say yes, but only if really necessary, otherwise I say "no thats the ones that came out" I dont think its fair that I get pressured (always-from clients or photographers I work for) to deliver the pics asap. and the video editors deliver the work a month later (no less) on average. it takes them 9 hours (at most) to edit a movie and me it takes no less than 6 hours for my work. I work slow and im a perfectionist. also, my eyes are very sensitive and cant do editing for more than 2 hours straight. I usually have to break it into a few sessions. so 6 hours and they want it in 3 days and vid editor works 9 hours and delivers after a month. wheres the proportion. from now on, I will tell them up to 2 weeks. I have tons of other stuff I do as well. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other Stuff
Off Topic
* Scott Murray has reached 5000 posts!* 12:10 AM
Top