Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Other Photography Equipment
Scott Kelby switches to Canon
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BackdoorArts" data-source="post: 251202" data-attributes="member: 9240"><p>Just watched it and it was like talking to my brother. For the pro sports photographer there's not a lot that will beat the 1Dx, for every reason he mentioned (though my brother prefers the crop of the Mark IV). There was another post about a month back about a guy who shot Canon for a day at a car rally because it was the only thing available with built-in wifi and he said the same thing. I think if you throw in Canon's professional services in on top and it's no wonder a working sports photographer would opt for Canon over Nikon. Just too many cool things that work so well for that niche. That said there's not a lot in here that talks about what Nikon doesn't do, and I would hope that when the full blown D4s specs are available you'll find something more attractive to the sports photographer niche. They've already said they've upgraded the auto-focus systems. Unfortunately, it's tough to play catch-up when your competition is already doing some important things better.</p><p></p><p>Regardless, based on everything I've seen and from what I've read and heard from many pros I trust, I do believe Nikon has a better bang for the buck camera for the high level amateur and semi-pro. So for anyone who is swayed by the name on a strap and not the specs of the camera they need then this is a win for Canon. Otherwise, let's hope it's another kick in the butt for the Nikon R&D team.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BackdoorArts, post: 251202, member: 9240"] Just watched it and it was like talking to my brother. For the pro sports photographer there's not a lot that will beat the 1Dx, for every reason he mentioned (though my brother prefers the crop of the Mark IV). There was another post about a month back about a guy who shot Canon for a day at a car rally because it was the only thing available with built-in wifi and he said the same thing. I think if you throw in Canon's professional services in on top and it's no wonder a working sports photographer would opt for Canon over Nikon. Just too many cool things that work so well for that niche. That said there's not a lot in here that talks about what Nikon doesn't do, and I would hope that when the full blown D4s specs are available you'll find something more attractive to the sports photographer niche. They've already said they've upgraded the auto-focus systems. Unfortunately, it's tough to play catch-up when your competition is already doing some important things better. Regardless, based on everything I've seen and from what I've read and heard from many pros I trust, I do believe Nikon has a better bang for the buck camera for the high level amateur and semi-pro. So for anyone who is swayed by the name on a strap and not the specs of the camera they need then this is a win for Canon. Otherwise, let's hope it's another kick in the butt for the Nikon R&D team. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Other Photography Equipment
Scott Kelby switches to Canon
Top