Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="WayneF" data-source="post: 543464" data-attributes="member: 12496">That seems a good plan, the YN568 is twice as strong as the SB-400, a full stop stronger.&nbsp; This is pretty important for bounce, or for umbrellas, etc.But the Commander and the YN622 systems are different....&nbsp;&nbsp; Similar goals, but different.&nbsp; Commander uses line of sight optical, and some difficult situations give trouble triggering reliably, distance, obstacles, sunlight... Plus subject blinking and catchlights in the subject.&nbsp; It is not a perfect system. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />The 622 is a radio system, should not have any of those same problems.&nbsp; However, they are different designs, and I don't have 622 experience to know how &quot;equal&quot; they perform.&nbsp; But they do seem popular.&nbsp; I would read awhile first about them.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="WayneF, post: 543464, member: 12496"] That seems a good plan, the YN568 is twice as strong as the SB-400, a full stop stronger. This is pretty important for bounce, or for umbrellas, etc. But the Commander and the YN622 systems are different.... Similar goals, but different. Commander uses line of sight optical, and some difficult situations give trouble triggering reliably, distance, obstacles, sunlight... Plus subject blinking and catchlights in the subject. It is not a perfect system. :) The 622 is a radio system, should not have any of those same problems. However, they are different designs, and I don't have 622 experience to know how "equal" they perform. But they do seem popular. I would read awhile first about them. [/QUOTE]

Verification