Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Saving a bit and getting a Sigma lens?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CL Extreme" data-source="post: 1250" data-attributes="member: 442"><p>I had the 120-300 sigma 2.8 it was a really nice lens, heavy and you needed a mono pod or such to hold it for a long time. My friend has the 120-400 with OS it not as fast but I gave it a try and for the money it's not bad, A little soft but your not spending the extra 2 to 4K on a 2.8 pro lens. Sigma new 70-200 2.8 is a killer buy it fast and rated almost the same as the nikon. would give you a 300mm in a DX body.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CL Extreme, post: 1250, member: 442"] I had the 120-300 sigma 2.8 it was a really nice lens, heavy and you needed a mono pod or such to hold it for a long time. My friend has the 120-400 with OS it not as fast but I gave it a try and for the money it's not bad, A little soft but your not spending the extra 2 to 4K on a 2.8 pro lens. Sigma new 70-200 2.8 is a killer buy it fast and rated almost the same as the nikon. would give you a 300mm in a DX body. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Saving a bit and getting a Sigma lens?
Top
