Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="jdeg" data-source="post: 219414" data-attributes="member: 1">I really like the fact that Samsung is paving the way for Android powered cameras, however I don't like the fact that their latest camera, the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00FB2X0B8/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=B00FB2X0B8&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;tag=nikonites-20" target="_blank">Galaxy NX, is $1700</a>!! [ATTACH]59369[/ATTACH][ATTACH]59370[/ATTACH]Granted, it has some pretty neat features, like:<ul>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">Mirrorless design</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">20.3mp CMOS</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">Android 4.2 JB</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">4.8 inch 720p touch s</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">ISO 100-25,600</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">8.6fps</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">3g/4g cellular data, wi-fi</li>
</ul>Engadget did a good review on it here: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2013/11/15/samsung-galaxy-nx-review/" target="_blank">Samsung Galaxy NX review: an overpriced Android-powered mirrorless camera</a>What do you think?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="jdeg, post: 219414, member: 1"] I really like the fact that Samsung is paving the way for Android powered cameras, however I don't like the fact that their latest camera, the [URL="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00FB2X0B8/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B00FB2X0B8&linkCode=as2&tag=nikonites-20"]Galaxy NX, is $1700[/URL]!! [ATTACH=CONFIG]59369._xfImport[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]59370._xfImport[/ATTACH] Granted, it has some pretty neat features, like: [LIST] [*]Mirrorless design [*]20.3mp CMOS [*]Android 4.2 JB [*]4.8 inch 720p touch s [*]ISO 100-25,600 [*]8.6fps [*]3g/4g cellular data, wi-fi [/LIST] Engadget did a good review on it here: [URL="http://www.engadget.com/2013/11/15/samsung-galaxy-nx-review/"]Samsung Galaxy NX review: an overpriced Android-powered mirrorless camera[/URL] What do you think? [/QUOTE]

Verification