Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="BackdoorArts" data-source="post: 129266" data-attributes="member: 9240">I had been considering repurposing my old D90 as an IR body until I read that it is on the list of bodies that the folks at LifePixel are having issues achieving proper white balance with.&nbsp; There are software workarounds (Capture NX2), but I didn't want to change my workflow for it.&nbsp; There's definitely a learning curve to it, including getting a sharp focus.&nbsp; Some softness is definitely a function of the light you're not getting to the sensor any more, so you lose edges.&nbsp; My brother shoots a lot of it and we talked about some compensation he's needed to make with focus to get it crisp, but I don't recall what he does differently.&nbsp; Some of it will definitely have to do with the added exposure time required by the sensor.&nbsp; Maybe one of these days I'll get to it. Looking forward to watching as you as you shoot more of it.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="BackdoorArts, post: 129266, member: 9240"] I had been considering repurposing my old D90 as an IR body until I read that it is on the list of bodies that the folks at LifePixel are having issues achieving proper white balance with. There are software workarounds (Capture NX2), but I didn't want to change my workflow for it. There's definitely a learning curve to it, including getting a sharp focus. Some softness is definitely a function of the light you're [I]not [/I]getting to the sensor any more, so you lose edges. My brother shoots a lot of it and we talked about some compensation he's needed to make with focus to get it crisp, but I don't recall what he does differently. Some of it will definitely have to do with the added exposure time required by the sensor. Maybe one of these days I'll get to it. Looking forward to watching as you as you shoot more of it. [/QUOTE]

Verification