Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Photo Evaluation
Photo Critique
RSA Tower Panorama
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kodiak" data-source="post: 172205" data-attributes="member: 15426"><p>Hey Don,</p><p></p><p>This is an outstanding work!</p><p>Not because of the shot but because of the work! …it was planned, carried out and</p><p>executed with care. </p><p></p><p>Mind you, though the shot is ok to me, the value is in the work.</p><p></p><p>And since you went so far to achieve this, I shall presume that going further is your aim.</p><p></p><p><strong>On this reduced and compressed file </strong> </p><p>• I see no trace of stitching.</p><p>• I see a heavy presence of compression artifacts that is perfectly normal in web-format rendition.</p><p>• the tonal values are right on, except for the entrance that could be trimmed down a tad.</p><p>• I see a falloff in the upper right corner the is to be awaited in those light conditions.</p><p>• the WB is very well chosen. From all the other possibilities, this one works the best.</p><p>• the cut off pool is not a negative point in the shot, no concern there.</p><p>• the parallax correction is not at 100%.</p><p>• the rendition is very noisy, which confirms the declared ISO value and, along with the wide</p><p>apperture (declared as well), suggest 2 possibilities: either…</p><p style="margin-left: 20px">1. you worked handheld with high risk -which implies meticulous handling of the camera to finally</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">obtain such a flawless stitch or</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">2. you use a tripod (better for the stitching) and a wrong strategy in regard to the exposition. </p><p></p><p>Hoping you do not feel having lost your time reading all this,</p><p></p><p>Vbrg,</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kodiak, post: 172205, member: 15426"] Hey Don, This is an outstanding work! Not because of the shot but because of the work! …it was planned, carried out and executed with care. Mind you, though the shot is ok to me, the value is in the work. And since you went so far to achieve this, I shall presume that going further is your aim. [B]On this reduced and compressed file [/B] • I see no trace of stitching. • I see a heavy presence of compression artifacts that is perfectly normal in web-format rendition. • the tonal values are right on, except for the entrance that could be trimmed down a tad. • I see a falloff in the upper right corner the is to be awaited in those light conditions. • the WB is very well chosen. From all the other possibilities, this one works the best. • the cut off pool is not a negative point in the shot, no concern there. • the parallax correction is not at 100%. • the rendition is very noisy, which confirms the declared ISO value and, along with the wide apperture (declared as well), suggest 2 possibilities: either… [INDENT]1. you worked handheld with high risk -which implies meticulous handling of the camera to finally obtain such a flawless stitch or 2. you use a tripod (better for the stitching) and a wrong strategy in regard to the exposition. [/INDENT] Hoping you do not feel having lost your time reading all this, Vbrg, [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Photo Evaluation
Photo Critique
RSA Tower Panorama
Top
