Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Kias" data-source="post: 118180" data-attributes="member: 9496">Well...Lemme pull up LR and take a peek.I knew white on white is a rough one, and I've never done it before, which is why I attempted it in the first place.&nbsp; When I took it, the camera-o-meter said the exposure was proper, but I know it's not always correct.Here's the histogram and photo unprocessed.&nbsp; It does look a little dark.&nbsp; I have no idea what those spikes going off the chart mean.[ATTACH=full]28136[/ATTACH][ATTACH=full]28135[/ATTACH]Here it is with a little more contrast (and the settings in the original photo I posted)[ATTACH=full]28137[/ATTACH]If I even touch the white balance a tiny little bit, it messes the whole thing up, so I don't think it's that.&nbsp; Maybe I should've used a flash...&nbsp; I guess I could try again tomorrow if it's still there.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Kias, post: 118180, member: 9496"] Well... Lemme pull up LR and take a peek. I knew white on white is a rough one, and I've never done it before, which is why I attempted it in the first place. When I took it, the camera-o-meter said the exposure was proper, but I know it's not always correct. Here's the histogram and photo unprocessed. It does look a little dark. I have no idea what those spikes going off the chart mean. [ATTACH type="full" width="30%"]28136._xfImport[/ATTACH] [ATTACH type="full" width="30%"]28135._xfImport[/ATTACH] Here it is with a little more contrast (and the settings in the original photo I posted) [ATTACH type="full" width="30%"]28137._xfImport[/ATTACH] If I even touch the white balance a tiny little bit, it messes the whole thing up, so I don't think it's that. Maybe I should've used a flash... I guess I could try again tomorrow if it's still there. [/QUOTE]

Verification