Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Flashes
Ring Lights?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="WayneF" data-source="post: 166805" data-attributes="member: 12496"><p>[wince]</p><p></p><p>Ring lights may have advantages, but pleasing lighting is not one of them. They are merely a convenient way to get on-the-lens-axis very even light over the scene (i.e., abysmally flat lighting). Dull, uninteresting.</p><p></p><p>This could be good in some scientific uses, where the sole purpose is to show everything clinically and well, but proper photographic lighting needs a few shadows. Not harsh dark shadows, but soft gradient tones are extremely pleasant, and these gradient shading tones show the shape of the subjects curves, etc. Shadows are created by off-camera lighting angles, and soft lighting is caused by large lights. Like umbrellas for a studio portrait, etc. This is the basis of "lighting". Pleasant lighting.</p><p></p><p>You could use that studio umbrella for macro, at least in a fixed situation. It still offers the same advantages. Here is an example: <a href="http://www.scantips.com/lights/flashbasics3.html" target="_blank">Four Flash Photography Basics we must know - Soft Light</a></p><p></p><p> But... macro work is very close, and close makes large. It is relative, so a 2 inch flash head at 6 inches is as "large" as a 2 foot light at 6 feet. It is easy to make it larger than 2 inches though.</p><p></p><p>So for a regular speedlight on the hot shoe, just aim it sideways into a small white reflector board (a foot or two size, and close, maybe a foot or so from the flash), which reflects soft off-camera light onto the little macro subject (try to prevent direct flash from hitting the subject - watch the shadows). A fixed setting could use a close reflector on both sides, with the flash aimed at one of them (and the other is fill). </p><p> Or put a white paper sack or cloth over the flash head so the light is effectively several inches larger (and camera close). A speedlight is probably six inches above the lens (off-camera above, esp to a six inch subject distance). Inefficient of flash power, most light may miss the subject, but at macro distances, it is of no importance. What does get there is plenty.</p><p></p><p>Anyway, the subject is lighting, and a ring light is NOT a universal answer.</p><p></p><p>Just one opinion.</p><p></p><p>And of course, the speedlight can be used for very many other uses too.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="WayneF, post: 166805, member: 12496"] [wince] Ring lights may have advantages, but pleasing lighting is not one of them. They are merely a convenient way to get on-the-lens-axis very even light over the scene (i.e., abysmally flat lighting). Dull, uninteresting. This could be good in some scientific uses, where the sole purpose is to show everything clinically and well, but proper photographic lighting needs a few shadows. Not harsh dark shadows, but soft gradient tones are extremely pleasant, and these gradient shading tones show the shape of the subjects curves, etc. Shadows are created by off-camera lighting angles, and soft lighting is caused by large lights. Like umbrellas for a studio portrait, etc. This is the basis of "lighting". Pleasant lighting. You could use that studio umbrella for macro, at least in a fixed situation. It still offers the same advantages. Here is an example: [URL="http://www.scantips.com/lights/flashbasics3.html"]Four Flash Photography Basics we must know - Soft Light[/URL] But... macro work is very close, and close makes large. It is relative, so a 2 inch flash head at 6 inches is as "large" as a 2 foot light at 6 feet. It is easy to make it larger than 2 inches though. So for a regular speedlight on the hot shoe, just aim it sideways into a small white reflector board (a foot or two size, and close, maybe a foot or so from the flash), which reflects soft off-camera light onto the little macro subject (try to prevent direct flash from hitting the subject - watch the shadows). A fixed setting could use a close reflector on both sides, with the flash aimed at one of them (and the other is fill). Or put a white paper sack or cloth over the flash head so the light is effectively several inches larger (and camera close). A speedlight is probably six inches above the lens (off-camera above, esp to a six inch subject distance). Inefficient of flash power, most light may miss the subject, but at macro distances, it is of no importance. What does get there is plenty. Anyway, the subject is lighting, and a ring light is NOT a universal answer. Just one opinion. And of course, the speedlight can be used for very many other uses too. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Flashes
Ring Lights?
Top