Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikon Compact Digital Cameras
Non-Nikon Cameras
Rick's Olympus Images
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rick M" data-source="post: 469968" data-attributes="member: 4399"><p>Since that post and many images, I'm finding similar results as you have mentioned in the noise area. As far as highlights, using an ISO of 200 as a base has actually helped in PP, I could have done that with Nikon and had more latitude in post. It really comes down to the quality of the individual shot. The m4/3 sensor is a very close second to Nikon Dx, but obviously you'll get superior results with the D600 and above. Larger sensors will always be more forgiving. Form factor won me over and I really like the 2x crop for wildlife, the increased DoF is a benefit too (or a curse for some). The smaller 2.8 pro zooms are fantastic. On the negative side, Oly is still using 3 year old sensors, I think the next generation will be a huge step forward. I'm considering the EM 5 Mk II which has a 40 mp high resolution mode, for still life only, but it holds it's own against the D810 in that area.</p><p></p><p>I wouldn't jump back in until the EM 1 II shows up with a newer sensor (we are hoping for next year). I knew what I could do lugging 10 lbs of Nikon gear (excellent IQ), the challenge is can I do the same with 5 lbs of Olympus? Not exactly but I'm having more fun, hiking is more enjoyable.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rick M, post: 469968, member: 4399"] Since that post and many images, I'm finding similar results as you have mentioned in the noise area. As far as highlights, using an ISO of 200 as a base has actually helped in PP, I could have done that with Nikon and had more latitude in post. It really comes down to the quality of the individual shot. The m4/3 sensor is a very close second to Nikon Dx, but obviously you'll get superior results with the D600 and above. Larger sensors will always be more forgiving. Form factor won me over and I really like the 2x crop for wildlife, the increased DoF is a benefit too (or a curse for some). The smaller 2.8 pro zooms are fantastic. On the negative side, Oly is still using 3 year old sensors, I think the next generation will be a huge step forward. I'm considering the EM 5 Mk II which has a 40 mp high resolution mode, for still life only, but it holds it's own against the D810 in that area. I wouldn't jump back in until the EM 1 II shows up with a newer sensor (we are hoping for next year). I knew what I could do lugging 10 lbs of Nikon gear (excellent IQ), the challenge is can I do the same with 5 lbs of Olympus? Not exactly but I'm having more fun, hiking is more enjoyable. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikon Compact Digital Cameras
Non-Nikon Cameras
Rick's Olympus Images
Top