Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Carroll" data-source="post: 126861" data-attributes="member: 9246">Rick, your experience shows in your images...interesting, great PP, and on, and on. I enjoy looking at them. These two are just two more really good ones.You probably already know that you can replace the sky in your photos, with another that you like better. I am posting this for those that are not aware of that.The Photoshop method to do that can be found at:<a href="http://www.photoshopessentials.com/photo-editing/replace-sky/" target="_blank">How To Replace The Sky In A Photo With Photoshop</a>&nbsp; &nbsp; This is free.Even though I purchased his tutorials, I am not trying to convince anyone to buy anything. I hate when that happens. If one is careful, you can replace the sky in an image almost perfectly, with a another sky that you like better. Pixel peepers will probably find something, but they will have to look *real* careful. I know, this may be seen to some as &quot;cheating&quot;. I think it is no different than using photomatix, or other numerous PP techniques. Everyone will not agree on that, of course. I look at photography as art, and enhancement and alterations are just a part of that, in my humble opinion. My preference is the natural looking photo, whatever that is.I apologize for kinda hijacking your thread...hope I have not offended you.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Carroll, post: 126861, member: 9246"] Rick, your experience shows in your images...interesting, great PP, and on, and on. I enjoy looking at them. These two are just two more really good ones. You probably already know that you can replace the sky in your photos, with another that you like better. I am posting this for those that are not aware of that. The Photoshop method to do that can be found at: [url=http://www.photoshopessentials.com/photo-editing/replace-sky/]How To Replace The Sky In A Photo With Photoshop[/url] This is free. Even though I purchased his tutorials, I am not trying to convince anyone to buy anything. I hate when that happens. If one is careful, you can replace the sky in an image almost perfectly, with a another sky that you like better. Pixel peepers will probably find something, but they will have to look *real* careful. I know, this may be seen to some as "cheating". I think it is no different than using photomatix, or other numerous PP techniques. Everyone will not agree on that, of course. I look at photography as art, and enhancement and alterations are just a part of that, in my humble opinion. My preference is the natural looking photo, whatever that is. I apologize for kinda hijacking your thread...hope I have not offended you. [/QUOTE]

Verification