Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D7200
Reviewers who grumble...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Nero" data-source="post: 431137" data-attributes="member: 14723"><p>Personally, after using the camera I think people should actually try it out before they bash it. It's a camera that on paper, seems like an incremental update but is actually worth more than the sum of its parts. The AF for one is definitely improved even though it still has the same number of points, built-in WiFi is much better than using one of those adapters, and even at 6fps the camera shoots fast enough that it should do most action shooters justice. Plus, as mentioned the buffer is far better which was the only real negative of the D7100. Plus much better ISO range (most people won't bother going higher than 3200-6400 but for those select few the capability is there.) The new processor alone makes all of this better.</p><p></p><p>Sure I would have liked 4k video but the lack of it is something I can live with and the fact that 60p video is only available in 1.3x crop mode is odd but I'm not going to do much slow-mo personally plus there are ways of replicating it in editing. </p><p></p><p>I've barely begun to delve into it but I see no reason to pay attention to naysayers. It's like with smartphones, these days people expect every new model to be sort of miraculous breakthrough in innovation blowing away its predecessor and if it's anything less they only see it as a small update and not worth bothering with.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Nero, post: 431137, member: 14723"] Personally, after using the camera I think people should actually try it out before they bash it. It's a camera that on paper, seems like an incremental update but is actually worth more than the sum of its parts. The AF for one is definitely improved even though it still has the same number of points, built-in WiFi is much better than using one of those adapters, and even at 6fps the camera shoots fast enough that it should do most action shooters justice. Plus, as mentioned the buffer is far better which was the only real negative of the D7100. Plus much better ISO range (most people won't bother going higher than 3200-6400 but for those select few the capability is there.) The new processor alone makes all of this better. Sure I would have liked 4k video but the lack of it is something I can live with and the fact that 60p video is only available in 1.3x crop mode is odd but I'm not going to do much slow-mo personally plus there are ways of replicating it in editing. I've barely begun to delve into it but I see no reason to pay attention to naysayers. It's like with smartphones, these days people expect every new model to be sort of miraculous breakthrough in innovation blowing away its predecessor and if it's anything less they only see it as a small update and not worth bothering with. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D7200
Reviewers who grumble...
Top