Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Woodyg3" data-source="post: 430783" data-attributes="member: 24569">Okay, there are tons of reviewers who are unhappy that the D7200 wasn't more of an upgrade over the D7100. I think they were either wanting a $2000+ camera priced at $1200, or what they really wanted Nikon to do was come out with a D400 (or whatever Nikon would call it) with features similar to the D750, 10 fps and a miracle DX sensor. Nikon fixed the most often complained of issue with the D7100 by improving the buffer size greatly, and they made several other incremental improvements. As more and more people get the camera and use it, we'll have more to talk about, of course. I suppose they should have named it the D7100S so as not to raise some people's expectations too much. Really, though, for $1200, I don't see much of an issue to complain about. What do you all think?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Woodyg3, post: 430783, member: 24569"] [COLOR=#3F4549][FONT=Helvetica Neue]Okay, there are tons of reviewers who are unhappy that the D7200 wasn't more of an upgrade over the D7100. I think they were either wanting a $2000+ camera priced at $1200, or what they really wanted Nikon to do was come out with a D400 (or whatever Nikon would call it) with features similar to the D750, 10 fps and a miracle DX sensor. Nikon fixed the most often complained of issue with the D7100 by improving the buffer size greatly, and they made several other incremental improvements. As more and more people get the camera and use it, we'll have more to talk about, of course. I suppose they should have named it the D7100S so as not to raise some people's expectations too much. Really, though, for $1200, I don't see much of an issue to complain about. What do you all think?[/FONT][/COLOR] [/QUOTE]

Verification