Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="J-see" data-source="post: 433487" data-attributes="member: 31330">He's still mentioning the D7200 does a good job even in comparison to his D4s when taking certain shots which is impressive at the least.I'm curious about the test reviews but since the pixel pitch is identical to the rest, any low light gain will be because of limiting, or better processing, of in camera noise. Combined with good noise reduction in post, that might be worthwhile the upgrade.<a href="http://www.cameracomparisonreview.com/2015/03/28/high-iso-test-nikon-d7200-vs-nikon-d7100/" target="_blank">HIGH ISO TEST ? Nikon D7200 vs. Nikon D7100 | Camera Comparison Review</a>There's only some partial testing here and there atm.I'm reading some more tests (of other cams) and it's interesting how easily you get the wrong impression when reading descriptions like &quot;class leading dynamic range&quot;. It makes you think it's phenomenally different from all the previous cams but when you check the numbers, you notice that just 1 point more could make it &quot;class leading&quot; too. This sort of hyping results in cams like the D610 to be almost non-existing these days, as if they no longer matter. But when checking the numbers, it really isn't much different from the newer FX.There's a lot of cheap trickery going on and not just in post processing. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="J-see, post: 433487, member: 31330"] He's still mentioning the D7200 does a good job even in comparison to his D4s when taking certain shots which is impressive at the least. I'm curious about the test reviews but since the pixel pitch is identical to the rest, any low light gain will be because of limiting, or better processing, of in camera noise. Combined with good noise reduction in post, that might be worthwhile the upgrade. [URL="http://www.cameracomparisonreview.com/2015/03/28/high-iso-test-nikon-d7200-vs-nikon-d7100/"]HIGH ISO TEST ? Nikon D7200 vs. Nikon D7100 | Camera Comparison Review[/URL] There's only some partial testing here and there atm. I'm reading some more tests (of other cams) and it's interesting how easily you get the wrong impression when reading descriptions like "class leading dynamic range". It makes you think it's phenomenally different from all the previous cams but when you check the numbers, you notice that just 1 point more could make it "class leading" too. This sort of hyping results in cams like the D610 to be almost non-existing these days, as if they no longer matter. But when checking the numbers, it really isn't much different from the newer FX. There's a lot of cheap trickery going on and not just in post processing. ;) [/QUOTE]

Verification