Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="PhotoAV8R" data-source="post: 180918" data-attributes="member: 939">A recent post here contained an article from another source and there was no attribution for that source or the author of the article. There have been discussions here concerning the issue of posting another's work as one's own. While this was not the case in the post I'm referring to (claiming another's work as one's own), the lack of attribution, to me, shows at least an ignorance of how to properly share another's work.In most cases, I would think it best to simply provide a link to the site where it was found, without re-posting the entire article. &quot;Hey, check out this article I found on landscape lighting...&quot;If one feels the article must be re-posted locally, it should contain the entire piece, including attribution, as well as a link to the site where it was found.We pride ourselves on our efforts in photography. We should respect nothing less for other artists.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="PhotoAV8R, post: 180918, member: 939"] A recent post here contained an article from another source and there was no attribution for that source or the author of the article. There have been discussions here concerning the issue of posting another's work as one's own. While this was not the case in the post I'm referring to (claiming another's work as one's own), the lack of attribution, to me, shows at least an ignorance of how to properly share another's work. In most cases, I would think it best to simply provide a link to the site where it was found, without re-posting the entire article. [I]"Hey, check out this article I found on landscape lighting..."[/I] If one feels the article must be re-posted locally, it should contain the entire piece, including attribution, as well as a link to the site where it was found. We pride ourselves on our efforts in photography. We should respect nothing less for other artists. [/QUOTE]

Verification