Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Photography Q&A
Resolution Settings, Small, Medium and Large vs. Image quality
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="WayneF" data-source="post: 542180" data-attributes="member: 12496"><p>It is a personal choice, but I strongly agree with your Fine quality. Changing away from Fine is always wrong. A good small image is always better than a large poor quality. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>If you never print anything, and only view on the video screen, Small should be plenty. Screens are smaller than that. But what if the picture of a lifetime does show up that you do want to print? Deciding later seems the best plan.</p><p></p><p>Even Small size will still print an 8x10, if very little cropping. But what if you end up with something good, but which really does need substantial cropping? Or that you want a large poster print? </p><p></p><p>Is the size really a problem? Today we have very large disks and very large camera cards, etc. I think we should just bite the bullet, and be prepared for the size, and not look back. We can always resample smaller later if we choose, but going the other way is the problem.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="WayneF, post: 542180, member: 12496"] It is a personal choice, but I strongly agree with your Fine quality. Changing away from Fine is always wrong. A good small image is always better than a large poor quality. :) If you never print anything, and only view on the video screen, Small should be plenty. Screens are smaller than that. But what if the picture of a lifetime does show up that you do want to print? Deciding later seems the best plan. Even Small size will still print an 8x10, if very little cropping. But what if you end up with something good, but which really does need substantial cropping? Or that you want a large poster print? Is the size really a problem? Today we have very large disks and very large camera cards, etc. I think we should just bite the bullet, and be prepared for the size, and not look back. We can always resample smaller later if we choose, but going the other way is the problem. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Photography Q&A
Resolution Settings, Small, Medium and Large vs. Image quality
Top