Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Photography Q&A
Resolution Settings, Small, Medium and Large vs. Image quality
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="alarmguy" data-source="post: 542165" data-attributes="member: 41828"><p>New to this forum, I am a casual photographer with a Nikon 3300 and I never really searched hard but I have searched to find out about something I read a long time ago. </p><p>My hope here is someone (pro or semi pro) can answer firmly with a certain answer. </p><p></p><p>Lets say I am using my digital camera like a "film camera" and perfectly frame what I want in the picture and do not intend on cropping. </p><p>Is there any advantage or disadvantage in image quality by taking lower resolution photos? I always take photos in the "fine" mode no matter what resolution I choose.</p><p></p><p>My Nikon 3300 offers, Large 6000 x 4000 24M, Medium 4496 x 3000 15.5m and small 2992 x 2000 6m photographs.</p><p></p><p>So my question, other then image size am I giving up ANY quality (or get better image quality) if I dont crop and use the smaller 15.5m or 6m setting for prints never then larger 11x14?</p><p></p><p>Hope this doesnt sound like a stupid question but think its legit, does taking smaller resolution photos on a 24 MP image sensor improve, decline or unchange image quality if you are not going to print a photo over 11x14?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="alarmguy, post: 542165, member: 41828"] New to this forum, I am a casual photographer with a Nikon 3300 and I never really searched hard but I have searched to find out about something I read a long time ago. My hope here is someone (pro or semi pro) can answer firmly with a certain answer. Lets say I am using my digital camera like a "film camera" and perfectly frame what I want in the picture and do not intend on cropping. Is there any advantage or disadvantage in image quality by taking lower resolution photos? I always take photos in the "fine" mode no matter what resolution I choose. My Nikon 3300 offers, Large 6000 x 4000 24M, Medium 4496 x 3000 15.5m and small 2992 x 2000 6m photographs. So my question, other then image size am I giving up ANY quality (or get better image quality) if I dont crop and use the smaller 15.5m or 6m setting for prints never then larger 11x14? Hope this doesnt sound like a stupid question but think its legit, does taking smaller resolution photos on a 24 MP image sensor improve, decline or unchange image quality if you are not going to print a photo over 11x14? [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Photography Q&A
Resolution Settings, Small, Medium and Large vs. Image quality
Top