Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Other Stuff
Off Topic
Resolution, output, collector or photographer?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AC016" data-source="post: 414886" data-attributes="member: 9619"><p>Yep, i agree. There are photographers that need those pixels because of how they are deploying their work/format they are selling it in. I printed out a 16 x 24 print of one of my photos taken when i had my D3000. It came out a bit soft, but i blame myself for that (being a newb, not using the camera right, not having the right file format to print, etc.). I was a total newb back then and i am sure that if i did the same shot today, i would do it a bit better. 16 x 24 is big and that print came from a 10mp camera. I have a 16mp camera now and can only imagine how much bigger i could print. Mind you, i am not sure my wife would want anything bigger then 16 x 24 hanging on the wall, lol. Point is, it is more then enough. If everyone thought about how they were going to "deploy" their photos and the fact that monitors are so far behind compared to camera sensors, i don't think anyone would bother with D750's or anything more then a 16-20 mp camera. Just my opinion.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AC016, post: 414886, member: 9619"] Yep, i agree. There are photographers that need those pixels because of how they are deploying their work/format they are selling it in. I printed out a 16 x 24 print of one of my photos taken when i had my D3000. It came out a bit soft, but i blame myself for that (being a newb, not using the camera right, not having the right file format to print, etc.). I was a total newb back then and i am sure that if i did the same shot today, i would do it a bit better. 16 x 24 is big and that print came from a 10mp camera. I have a 16mp camera now and can only imagine how much bigger i could print. Mind you, i am not sure my wife would want anything bigger then 16 x 24 hanging on the wall, lol. Point is, it is more then enough. If everyone thought about how they were going to "deploy" their photos and the fact that monitors are so far behind compared to camera sensors, i don't think anyone would bother with D750's or anything more then a 16-20 mp camera. Just my opinion. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other Stuff
Off Topic
Resolution, output, collector or photographer?
Top