Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Other Stuff
Off Topic
Remember the Chicago newspaper that replaced its photographers with the Apple iPhone
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="riverside" data-source="post: 166589" data-attributes="member: 14054"><p>I think the future of most newspaper photography not directly supported by advertising revenue lies in "stock" shots, independents and wire services. Labor costs, often unionized, include not only photographers but editors, production layout and materials. When operating revenue declines (circulation in that sector) the first thing any competent manager looks at (in the US) is labor cost.</p><p> </p><p>Up until about five years ago there were three local newspapers in my general area that solicited and published quality photos of local interest submitted by readers. When the financial crunch really hit, all were returning submissions with the message of no longer accepting same. </p><p></p><p>Just so we still photographers don't feel isolated by economic reality, local TV has the same financial problems in reduced advertising revenue. We do charity work and before the crunch when the Xmas holidays rolled around it was a simple matter of calling one's favored station and requesting a human interest segment to stimulate public interest in donations to a worthy cause. Yep, they sent a reporter and a video operator, did the interview and ran it several times during local prime time news. That's also history.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="riverside, post: 166589, member: 14054"] I think the future of most newspaper photography not directly supported by advertising revenue lies in "stock" shots, independents and wire services. Labor costs, often unionized, include not only photographers but editors, production layout and materials. When operating revenue declines (circulation in that sector) the first thing any competent manager looks at (in the US) is labor cost. Up until about five years ago there were three local newspapers in my general area that solicited and published quality photos of local interest submitted by readers. When the financial crunch really hit, all were returning submissions with the message of no longer accepting same. Just so we still photographers don't feel isolated by economic reality, local TV has the same financial problems in reduced advertising revenue. We do charity work and before the crunch when the Xmas holidays rolled around it was a simple matter of calling one's favored station and requesting a human interest segment to stimulate public interest in donations to a worthy cause. Yep, they sent a reporter and a video operator, did the interview and ran it several times during local prime time news. That's also history. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other Stuff
Off Topic
Remember the Chicago newspaper that replaced its photographers with the Apple iPhone
Top