Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Other Photography Equipment
Refurb 1.7x TC & 300mm PF
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="hark" data-source="post: 739959" data-attributes="member: 13196"><p>Today I went out with my previous 300mm f/4 AF-S (non-VR) and the refurbished 1.7x TC. I increased my shutter speed since this combo is both longer and a decent amount heavier. Both images were taken from the seat of my SUV.</p><p></p><p>Most of the images were pretty good. A couple were slightly soft - but this combo is heavier, and I have a chronic issue with trigger thumb and trigger finger in my right hand. Overall, I am still leaning towards it being the 300mm f/4 PF lens. But I want to narrow down whether it is just the Sport VR or if the AF is also a tad off.</p><p></p><p>At least I didn't have to use Shake Reduction which was becoming common with the 300mm PF. </p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]342625[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]342626[/ATTACH]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="hark, post: 739959, member: 13196"] Today I went out with my previous 300mm f/4 AF-S (non-VR) and the refurbished 1.7x TC. I increased my shutter speed since this combo is both longer and a decent amount heavier. Both images were taken from the seat of my SUV. Most of the images were pretty good. A couple were slightly soft - but this combo is heavier, and I have a chronic issue with trigger thumb and trigger finger in my right hand. Overall, I am still leaning towards it being the 300mm f/4 PF lens. But I want to narrow down whether it is just the Sport VR or if the AF is also a tad off. At least I didn't have to use Shake Reduction which was becoming common with the 300mm PF. [ATTACH type="full" width="60%"]342625._xfImport[/ATTACH] [ATTACH type="full" width="60%"]342626._xfImport[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Other Photography Equipment
Refurb 1.7x TC & 300mm PF
Top