Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="RocketCowboy" data-source="post: 381238" data-attributes="member: 25095">Good article.My good friend was nudging me hard to look at Fuji when I started talking about jumping back into digital photography and wanting a new DLSR instead of my point and shoot. I knew I wasn't going to seriously re-use any of my old film Nikon lenses, they just weren't that good even back then. Consequently, most of the other points really didn't apply to me either ... other than the &quot;I'm not shooting enough&quot; with is the rut I find myself in lately thanks to an aggressive business travel schedule.I also don't disagree with Chris about mirror-less being the future. That said though, the question I was asking myself was whether the future is now, or is it still in the future. To me, that's what this article is trying to articulate. The DSLRs out there haven't stopped taking photos, and haven't suddenly started capturing degraded images. Mirror-less is catching up, but as me and my friend compare images ... the primary differences between the two camera systems for us comes down to luck and skill ... at least at our level. Then again, neither of us are photographers. I'm just an IT dude and he's a finance guy.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="RocketCowboy, post: 381238, member: 25095"] Good article. My good friend was nudging me hard to look at Fuji when I started talking about jumping back into digital photography and wanting a new DLSR instead of my point and shoot. I knew I wasn't going to seriously re-use any of my old film Nikon lenses, they just weren't that good even back then. Consequently, most of the other points really didn't apply to me either ... other than the "I'm not shooting enough" with is the rut I find myself in lately thanks to an aggressive business travel schedule. I also don't disagree with Chris about mirror-less being the future. That said though, the question I was asking myself was whether the future is now, or is it still in the future. To me, that's what this article is trying to articulate. The DSLRs out there haven't stopped taking photos, and haven't suddenly started capturing degraded images. Mirror-less is catching up, but as me and my friend compare images ... the primary differences between the two camera systems for us comes down to luck and skill ... at least at our level. Then again, neither of us are photographers. I'm just an IT dude and he's a finance guy. [/QUOTE]

Verification