Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="BackdoorArts" data-source="post: 159052" data-attributes="member: 9240">Find any one of a bunch of FX/DX threads here and you're bound to find&nbsp;&nbsp; photo examples I've posted (no time to dig for you today).Reader's Digest version, there is absolutely no difference in DoF when you put the same lens on a DX or FX camera.&nbsp; &nbsp; Where there is a difference is when you try and match perspectives.&nbsp; &nbsp; With a 50mm lens on an FX camera you will need a 35mm lens on a DX&nbsp;&nbsp; camera in order to capture the same image view since the DX&nbsp; sensor is 1.5x smaller (i.e. smaller sensor needs a wider angle lens to&nbsp; see the same thing the larger sensor sees).&nbsp; A 35mm lens produces&nbsp;&nbsp; different DoF than a 50mm lens, so there will be an apparent difference in DoF with photos taken on a DX and FX camera, but it's because you're using different lenses.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="BackdoorArts, post: 159052, member: 9240"] Find any one of a bunch of FX/DX threads here and you're bound to find photo examples I've posted (no time to dig for you today). Reader's Digest version, there is [I][B]absolutely no difference in DoF when you put the [U]same lens[/U] on a DX or FX camera[/B][/I]. Where there is a difference is when you try and match perspectives. With a 50mm lens on an FX camera you will need a 35mm lens on a DX camera in order to capture the same [I]image view[/I] since the DX sensor is 1.5x smaller (i.e. smaller sensor needs a wider angle lens to see the same thing the larger sensor sees). A 35mm lens produces different DoF than a 50mm lens, so there will be an [I]apparent difference[/I] in DoF with photos taken on a DX and FX camera, but it's because you're using [B][I]different lenses[/I][/B]. [/QUOTE]

Verification