Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="J-see" data-source="post: 461130" data-attributes="member: 31330">The thing with wavelets is that it is processing at output size. If my final image will be 1000*800 there is little use in wavelets at the full sized image since you'll only see it well at 100% and that is lost when scaling the shot to a smaller output size.I work always in at least two steps:Rough processing and RL Deconvolution sharpening, crop and save as output size.Fine-tuning and final sharpening, save as JPEG.I think wavelets will work best when I use them in step two. The contrast levels are great to pull detail and the sharpening enables me to drop the normal sharpening that uses unsharp mask and in that end up with less artifacts like the fringing.Also; you need to click the activate button for the wavelet tool else nothing happens even if you move the sliders. They changed that for all tools since the previous versions.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="J-see, post: 461130, member: 31330"] The thing with wavelets is that it is processing at output size. If my final image will be 1000*800 there is little use in wavelets at the full sized image since you'll only see it well at 100% and that is lost when scaling the shot to a smaller output size. I work always in at least two steps: Rough processing and RL Deconvolution sharpening, crop and save as output size. Fine-tuning and final sharpening, save as JPEG. I think wavelets will work best when I use them in step two. The contrast levels are great to pull detail and the sharpening enables me to drop the normal sharpening that uses unsharp mask and in that end up with less artifacts like the fringing. Also; you need to click the activate button for the wavelet tool else nothing happens even if you move the sliders. They changed that for all tools since the previous versions. [/QUOTE]

Verification