Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Post Processing
RAWTherapee
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="J-see" data-source="post: 421889" data-attributes="member: 31330"><p>Ok; first my NEF as loaded in NX-D but I had to add two stops of light to the shot.</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH]142658[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>I simply exported the NEF as a TiFF with the ICC profile attached.</p><p></p><p>IN RT it then basically looks identical upon load. It looks better in the end because the demosaicing used is better in its output. I just loaded and saved.</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH]142659[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>When I load the NEF directly in RT and use cam standard + the Tam profile it looks like this at start (two stops added).</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH]142660[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>I shoot Cam neutral with every setting at zero which makes me assume RT shows that while NX-D <em>pops</em> it up for me. Also in RT (as in LR) I see the lens profile being applied while in NX-D, not much happens which explains the sizing difference. Maybe I'm wrong but I have the impression Nikon gives other lenses the finger in their soft.</p><p></p><p>In the end, even the RT version is just some values different from the other, a slider here and there and that's it.</p><p></p><p>Btw, all three JPEG are saved in the same size/format/quality but I just notice the file size difference is massive (450/720/610). I think the method NX-D uses to scale down isn't very good compared to what LR/PS or RT uses.</p><p></p><p>Once loaded, even with the NX-D colors, you can still push it into any direction you like. If I don't like overly white, I push it towards pastels and adjust blue or yellow when needed.</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH]142667[/ATTACH]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="J-see, post: 421889, member: 31330"] Ok; first my NEF as loaded in NX-D but I had to add two stops of light to the shot. [ATTACH=CONFIG]142658._xfImport[/ATTACH] I simply exported the NEF as a TiFF with the ICC profile attached. IN RT it then basically looks identical upon load. It looks better in the end because the demosaicing used is better in its output. I just loaded and saved. [ATTACH=CONFIG]142659._xfImport[/ATTACH] When I load the NEF directly in RT and use cam standard + the Tam profile it looks like this at start (two stops added). [ATTACH=CONFIG]142660._xfImport[/ATTACH] I shoot Cam neutral with every setting at zero which makes me assume RT shows that while NX-D [I]pops[/I] it up for me. Also in RT (as in LR) I see the lens profile being applied while in NX-D, not much happens which explains the sizing difference. Maybe I'm wrong but I have the impression Nikon gives other lenses the finger in their soft. In the end, even the RT version is just some values different from the other, a slider here and there and that's it. Btw, all three JPEG are saved in the same size/format/quality but I just notice the file size difference is massive (450/720/610). I think the method NX-D uses to scale down isn't very good compared to what LR/PS or RT uses. Once loaded, even with the NX-D colors, you can still push it into any direction you like. If I don't like overly white, I push it towards pastels and adjust blue or yellow when needed. [ATTACH=CONFIG]142667._xfImport[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Post Processing
RAWTherapee
Top
