Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="co2jae" data-source="post: 188201" data-attributes="member: 9917">Re: RAW vs. JPEGProbably Iphoto being bad more than you. I found IPhoto to be very lacking in what I liked to do for processing. I use the VIEW NX that came with my camera and I like it for now as I am new and learning. My friend gave me an expensive, professional program and I get lost with all the different options. I have found the best way to get good pictures is to take better photos. Practice your shooting skills and your post processing wont be needed as much. I do prefer shooting RAW now for manyof the reasons already listed after shooting mostly JPEG fine for the first 6 months or so.&nbsp; Good point about raw files being saved and returning to them later on for editing with new techniques learned. Has happened to me once or twice already&nbsp; <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="co2jae, post: 188201, member: 9917"] [b]Re: RAW vs. JPEG[/b] Probably Iphoto being bad more than you. I found IPhoto to be very lacking in what I liked to do for processing. I use the VIEW NX that came with my camera and I like it for now as I am new and learning. My friend gave me an expensive, professional program and I get lost with all the different options. I have found the best way to get good pictures is to take better photos. Practice your shooting skills and your post processing wont be needed as much. I do prefer shooting RAW now for manyof the reasons already listed after shooting mostly JPEG fine for the first 6 months or so. Good point about raw files being saved and returning to them later on for editing with new techniques learned. Has happened to me once or twice already :) [/QUOTE]

Verification