Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Photography
RAW vs JPEG
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Marcel" data-source="post: 113647" data-attributes="member: 3903"><p>Well you just have to remember that your should not use high rate frames per second to do film. Unless it's a very special moment, you can usually shoot 3-4 frames to get the image you want. I don't see the point in taking 25 images to get one shot. But that's me, I was raised with the single frame SLR and medium format camera and never sprayed and prayed. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Marcel, post: 113647, member: 3903"] Well you just have to remember that your should not use high rate frames per second to do film. Unless it's a very special moment, you can usually shoot 3-4 frames to get the image you want. I don't see the point in taking 25 images to get one shot. But that's me, I was raised with the single frame SLR and medium format camera and never sprayed and prayed. ;) [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Photography
RAW vs JPEG
Top
