Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Dawg Pics" data-source="post: 531286" data-attributes="member: 26505">The jpeg vs raw subject keeps coming up because it is confusing to beginners, and there are so many opinions regarding why some shoot one way versus another way or both. Sometimes one article will give you the &quot;aha&quot; moment, when others didn't. &quot;Link away&quot; is my philosophy.&nbsp; There is nothing wrong with linking an article that might be beneficial to a beginner.&nbsp; What topic hasn't been discussed to death on here?I kinda-sorta get it, but it didn't stop me from clicking on the link to read about it some more.I have a question regarding the article's image comparison. Was the author trying to show that Raw files are more uniform, and the jpeg file looks more &quot;artifacty&quot; (Yes, I know that isn't a real word. :shame<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Dawg Pics, post: 531286, member: 26505"] The jpeg vs raw subject keeps coming up because it is confusing to beginners, and there are so many opinions regarding why some shoot one way versus another way or both. Sometimes one article will give you the "aha" moment, when others didn't. "Link away" is my philosophy. There is nothing wrong with linking an article that might be beneficial to a beginner. What topic hasn't been discussed to death on here? I kinda-sorta get it, but it didn't stop me from clicking on the link to read about it some more. I have a question regarding the article's image comparison. Was the author trying to show that Raw files are more uniform, and the jpeg file looks more "artifacty" (Yes, I know that isn't a real word. :shame:) [/QUOTE]

Verification