Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Stoshowicz" data-source="post: 547386" data-attributes="member: 31397">This looks like its adjusting shutter speed faster, with the active D on, without changing ISO or aperture size, which you WOULD&nbsp; expect to affect actual exposure levels '' , it would then be affecting the raw file as well in that circumstance, correct?&nbsp;I'm wondering though, if this effect would or would not affect metering, or the actual applied shutter speed,&nbsp; in manual, where you actually set the shutter speed yourself.. I suspect , that in using manual adjustments the active D lighting feature would only be a processing mode for generating a JPEG. Either way , I dont understand how this this might actually increase the details of either darks or lights beyond what is already recoverable from a properly exposed RAW data file. And figure that there really is no use whatsoever for someone shooting raw, and may be counterproductive for someone shooting jpeg only ( because of the unintended downshift in expected exposure levels.)On the other hand , if it also affects the calibration , or sensitivity of the sensor at one end or the other one would be , possibly making a choice between dynamic range , and contrast.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Stoshowicz, post: 547386, member: 31397"] This looks like its adjusting shutter speed faster, with the active D on, without changing ISO or aperture size, which you WOULD expect to affect actual exposure levels '' , it [B]would[/B] then be affecting the raw file as well in that circumstance, correct? I'm wondering though, if this effect would or would not affect metering, or the actual applied shutter speed, in manual, where you actually set the shutter speed yourself.. I suspect , that in using manual adjustments the active D lighting feature would only be a processing mode for generating a JPEG. Either way , I dont understand how this this might actually increase the details of either darks or lights beyond what is already recoverable from a properly exposed RAW data file. And figure that there really is no use whatsoever for someone shooting raw, and may be counterproductive for someone shooting jpeg only ( because of the unintended downshift in expected exposure levels.) On the other hand , if it also affects the calibration , or sensitivity of the sensor at one end or the other one would be , possibly making a choice between dynamic range , and contrast. [/QUOTE]

Verification