Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Computers and Software
Raw conversion software , what's best.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BackdoorArts" data-source="post: 297930" data-attributes="member: 9240"><p>If you don't consider Smart Fill (which is <em>very</em> different from the Smart Healing brush), Elements can do about 95% of the work that I currently do in Photoshop. I suspect that were they to put Smart Fill in Elements they'd lose a lot of Photoshop customers. LR + PSE is all most amateur photographers will ever need in terms of tools. The rest is just a matter of making the work easier/less time consuming.</p><p></p><p>Ultimately, while you can knock the cloud all you want, for $11/month ($132/year) with tax, I believe that anyone who is tied into the products will save money. LR has been upgraded twice since I started using it in 2012, and is due for another upgrade in the next 6 months. Had I started using the cloud in 2012 (were it available) I would have spent less in the subscription than I paid to maintain Lightroom alone (1 initial purchase and 2 upgrades). I understand why folks balk, and they have every right to do it. But to anyone whose art relies on their products, I do believe that the current pricing structure is more than fair provided that the product updates continue as they have thus far.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BackdoorArts, post: 297930, member: 9240"] If you don't consider Smart Fill (which is [I]very[/I] different from the Smart Healing brush), Elements can do about 95% of the work that I currently do in Photoshop. I suspect that were they to put Smart Fill in Elements they'd lose a lot of Photoshop customers. LR + PSE is all most amateur photographers will ever need in terms of tools. The rest is just a matter of making the work easier/less time consuming. Ultimately, while you can knock the cloud all you want, for $11/month ($132/year) with tax, I believe that anyone who is tied into the products will save money. LR has been upgraded twice since I started using it in 2012, and is due for another upgrade in the next 6 months. Had I started using the cloud in 2012 (were it available) I would have spent less in the subscription than I paid to maintain Lightroom alone (1 initial purchase and 2 upgrades). I understand why folks balk, and they have every right to do it. But to anyone whose art relies on their products, I do believe that the current pricing structure is more than fair provided that the product updates continue as they have thus far. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Computers and Software
Raw conversion software , what's best.
Top