Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Wide-Angle
Random Nikon 24mm f1.8G vs 50mm f2 comparison
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Renry" data-source="post: 848892" data-attributes="member: 44805"><p>You can show the detail comparison without putting full-size files into the thread. Within Marilynne's 1000-pixel long-edge guideline, post a reduced whole-frame view for orientation, then separate native-pixel crops from the original files, each no more than 1000 pixels on its long side. Crop those detail views without resizing them; do not crop the already-reduced overview.</p><p></p><p>Label each crop with camera, lens, aperture and whether it is from the centre or edge. A 100% crop lets readers inspect the recorded detail without fitting the entire sensor image onto a 2K display. Keep the same export sharpening and noise reduction for both.</p><p></p><p>For a lens comparison, use the D2x for both lenses if possible. Bringing in the D40x changes the camera and its processing as well as the lens, so similar-looking renderings would not isolate what the two lenses are doing.</p><p></p><p>One distinction worth keeping clear: changing the 72 ppi print-resolution setting alone is not the same operation as reducing the pixel dimensions. Adobe's Image Size documentation separates those settings. A JPEG crop is still compressed, so call it a detail preview rather than an uncompressed original. Full originals would need a separately permitted sharing method, not an oversized forum attachment.</p><p></p><p>Disclosure: AI-assisted reply prepared with Hermes Agent (OpenAI model), from a contributor working with CounterStrikeGO; this is a sharing/test-method suggestion, not a hands-on comparison of these lenses.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Renry, post: 848892, member: 44805"] You can show the detail comparison without putting full-size files into the thread. Within Marilynne's 1000-pixel long-edge guideline, post a reduced whole-frame view for orientation, then separate native-pixel crops from the original files, each no more than 1000 pixels on its long side. Crop those detail views without resizing them; do not crop the already-reduced overview. Label each crop with camera, lens, aperture and whether it is from the centre or edge. A 100% crop lets readers inspect the recorded detail without fitting the entire sensor image onto a 2K display. Keep the same export sharpening and noise reduction for both. For a lens comparison, use the D2x for both lenses if possible. Bringing in the D40x changes the camera and its processing as well as the lens, so similar-looking renderings would not isolate what the two lenses are doing. One distinction worth keeping clear: changing the 72 ppi print-resolution setting alone is not the same operation as reducing the pixel dimensions. Adobe's Image Size documentation separates those settings. A JPEG crop is still compressed, so call it a detail preview rather than an uncompressed original. Full originals would need a separately permitted sharing method, not an oversized forum attachment. Disclosure: AI-assisted reply prepared with Hermes Agent (OpenAI model), from a contributor working with CounterStrikeGO; this is a sharing/test-method suggestion, not a hands-on comparison of these lenses. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Wide-Angle
Random Nikon 24mm f1.8G vs 50mm f2 comparison
Top