Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="RockyNH_RIP" data-source="post: 88543" data-attributes="member: 10784">Spoiled..&nbsp;&nbsp; I like that!!! <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite11" alt=":rolleyes:" title="Roll eyes&nbsp; &nbsp; :rolleyes:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":rolleyes:" />Thank you for the reply.&nbsp;&nbsp; I guess maybe I put too much into the ratings for High ISO on the 5200..&nbsp;&nbsp; may be like you said, rated to make a usable picture.. The ones that I did not blur were usable snaps but not heavy head shot crops.&nbsp; (Some were good though too).&nbsp; I was pushing the envelope with many subjects moving and too far away, severe crops etc.Likely I just need to learn the limits of the gear..&nbsp; &nbsp; I will do a test later at a stationary object and do 100, 200, 800, 1600, 3200 and 6400...&nbsp;&nbsp; also do each at 55mm 125mm and 200mm..&nbsp; &nbsp; Then I can see what the affects and capability are..Again, thanks for the replyPat in NH&nbsp;&nbsp; (always learning since I am not even a 2 month rookie yet)</blockquote>

[QUOTE="RockyNH_RIP, post: 88543, member: 10784"] Spoiled.. I like that!!! :rolleyes: Thank you for the reply. I guess maybe I put too much into the ratings for High ISO on the 5200.. may be like you said, rated to make a usable picture.. The ones that I did not blur were usable snaps but not heavy head shot crops. (Some were good though too). I was pushing the envelope with many subjects moving and too far away, severe crops etc. Likely I just need to learn the limits of the gear.. I will do a test later at a stationary object and do 100, 200, 800, 1600, 3200 and 6400... also do each at 55mm 125mm and 200mm.. Then I can see what the affects and capability are.. Again, thanks for the reply Pat in NH (always learning since I am not even a 2 month rookie yet) [/QUOTE]

Verification