Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Flashes
Question on the inverse square law
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="WayneF" data-source="post: 249216" data-attributes="member: 12496"><p>Zooming the camera is not a factor, except if the flash was on camea,<strong> the flash zooming in is a factor</strong>, the point of which is to concentrate the flash power into a small area, which is brighter. Generally in many speedlights, zooming from minimum to maximum zoom is near double GN, which is a couple of stops brighter.</p><p></p><p>If you change absolutely nothing except monitoring distance, then double distance (of direct bare unmodified flash) should be two stops weaker (1/4). Zooming the flash however is modification.</p><p></p><p>In a small constricted area, it might appear not quite so weak, due to reflections from side surfaces redirected back in, adding to combine.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="WayneF, post: 249216, member: 12496"] Zooming the camera is not a factor, except if the flash was on camea,[B] the flash zooming in is a factor[/B], the point of which is to concentrate the flash power into a small area, which is brighter. Generally in many speedlights, zooming from minimum to maximum zoom is near double GN, which is a couple of stops brighter. If you change absolutely nothing except monitoring distance, then double distance (of direct bare unmodified flash) should be two stops weaker (1/4). Zooming the flash however is modification. In a small constricted area, it might appear not quite so weak, due to reflections from side surfaces redirected back in, adding to combine. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Flashes
Question on the inverse square law
Top