Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Photo Evaluation
Photo Feedback
Question for the group on two versions of the same image
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="sOnIc" data-source="post: 196138" data-attributes="member: 15861"><p>Awesome image, many many options for cropping ... but surely there are restraints?</p><p></p><p>Like aspect ratio; the original will be 2:3 ratio I presume? And your crop is no longer 2:3, more wide-screen. Are you free to experiment? I'm maintaining 2:3 for all my crops at the moment; is that good practice, or too limiting?</p><p></p><p>Also how much picture to throw away; given enough resolution to achieve the end use. I've had a brief play in PS and the most pleasing result I came up with is almost entirely binning the sky, much less busy, using two-thirds water with the mountains in the top third; this makes the colourful canoeist stand out as more of the subject. But of-course that reduces the resolution by a third or more, I even tried making that a portrait image and it works really well! (All using 2:3) ... Where to draw the line ....?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="sOnIc, post: 196138, member: 15861"] Awesome image, many many options for cropping ... but surely there are restraints? Like aspect ratio; the original will be 2:3 ratio I presume? And your crop is no longer 2:3, more wide-screen. Are you free to experiment? I'm maintaining 2:3 for all my crops at the moment; is that good practice, or too limiting? Also how much picture to throw away; given enough resolution to achieve the end use. I've had a brief play in PS and the most pleasing result I came up with is almost entirely binning the sky, much less busy, using two-thirds water with the mountains in the top third; this makes the colourful canoeist stand out as more of the subject. But of-course that reduces the resolution by a third or more, I even tried making that a portrait image and it works really well! (All using 2:3) ... Where to draw the line ....? [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Photo Evaluation
Photo Feedback
Question for the group on two versions of the same image
Top