Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Other Stuff
Off Topic
Purchases you regret buying.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="hark" data-source="post: 374966" data-attributes="member: 13196"><p>I bought the latest version of Sigma's 70-200mm f/2.8 OS lens after reading such good reviews of it. At close distances such as 20 feet, it was terrific, but at 65 feet, the images had a lot to be desired. It's hard to explain, but the lens just didn't focus properly at long distances. Sigma was willing to recalibrate it and check it out, but after renting Nikon's version of the lens, the Nikon images SOOC were MUCH more impressive than my edited Sigma photos. I traded in the Sigma for a Nikon lens.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="hark, post: 374966, member: 13196"] I bought the latest version of Sigma's 70-200mm f/2.8 OS lens after reading such good reviews of it. At close distances such as 20 feet, it was terrific, but at 65 feet, the images had a lot to be desired. It's hard to explain, but the lens just didn't focus properly at long distances. Sigma was willing to recalibrate it and check it out, but after renting Nikon's version of the lens, the Nikon images SOOC were MUCH more impressive than my edited Sigma photos. I traded in the Sigma for a Nikon lens. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other Stuff
Off Topic
Purchases you regret buying.
Top
