Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Pros and Cons of Digiscoping
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="NVSteve" data-source="post: 148795" data-attributes="member: 13248"><p>I'm assuming you are talking about astrophotography?</p><p></p><p>Pros:</p><p>about the only way to capture really distance objects on the cheap</p><p>resulting images, when done properly, look very good</p><p></p><p>Cons: </p><p>fixed aperture</p><p>good scopes=$$$</p><p>not something you can really take with you on a hike</p><p>lots of time/effort required for good results</p><p></p><p>Of course you will also want a tracking mount to eliminate star trails. Lots of adapters available to make it work: brackets to allow for focusing onto the eyepiece image, t-mount adapters to use the scope as a lens, or eyepiece adapters.</p><p></p><p>If you are talking about land based digiscoping, then I apologize for all the info above which won't apply. Let me ask you this: have you ever used a mirror lens on a camera before? Digiscoping with something like a spotting scope looks worse, IMO, and certainly far worse than an actual lens. But, if you need 1200mm or whatever, scopes can be a cheap way to get it, and oftentimes the only way.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="NVSteve, post: 148795, member: 13248"] I'm assuming you are talking about astrophotography? Pros: about the only way to capture really distance objects on the cheap resulting images, when done properly, look very good Cons: fixed aperture good scopes=$$$ not something you can really take with you on a hike lots of time/effort required for good results Of course you will also want a tracking mount to eliminate star trails. Lots of adapters available to make it work: brackets to allow for focusing onto the eyepiece image, t-mount adapters to use the scope as a lens, or eyepiece adapters. If you are talking about land based digiscoping, then I apologize for all the info above which won't apply. Let me ask you this: have you ever used a mirror lens on a camera before? Digiscoping with something like a spotting scope looks worse, IMO, and certainly far worse than an actual lens. But, if you need 1200mm or whatever, scopes can be a cheap way to get it, and oftentimes the only way. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Pros and Cons of Digiscoping
Top