Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="J-see" data-source="post: 368545" data-attributes="member: 31330">That's the point these days; it becomes harder to see the difference between entry and pro. The main difference are the trinkets. Those trinkets are what you can remove out of the cam and still take the same shot albeit maybe requiring more skill, technique or patience. But quality-wise the shots are rather similar. The only real benefit in FX is whenever you can frame everything -but nothing more- into your shot. That's the wide and middle range usually. But even in that you could ask yourself if it is worth the price difference, quality related that is.The main reason we now see a difference between FX and DX is because the Exif says so. I'd be curious if the data is removed how many we'd be able to pick out. It'd be easier to pick out the good lenses.In the past it used to be different. If I had a 50$ click-clack cam and took a shot of something and some quality SLR did the same, mine looked as if I had a little guy with crayons inside. In those days, upgrading was a no-brainer. Today you wonder if it is worth it.The new FX are better, no argument there. The question is; exactly how many $ better?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="J-see, post: 368545, member: 31330"] That's the point these days; it becomes harder to see the difference between entry and pro. The main difference are the trinkets. Those trinkets are what you can remove out of the cam and still take the same shot albeit maybe requiring more skill, technique or patience. But quality-wise the shots are rather similar. The only real benefit in FX is whenever you can frame everything -but nothing more- into your shot. That's the wide and middle range usually. But even in that you could ask yourself if it is worth the price difference, quality related that is. The main reason we now see a difference between FX and DX is because the Exif says so. I'd be curious if the data is removed how many we'd be able to pick out. It'd be easier to pick out the good lenses. In the past it used to be different. If I had a 50$ click-clack cam and took a shot of something and some quality SLR did the same, mine looked as if I had a little guy with crayons inside. In those days, upgrading was a no-brainer. Today you wonder if it is worth it. The new FX are better, no argument there. The question is; exactly how many $ better? [/QUOTE]

Verification