Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="DaveW" data-source="post: 579105" data-attributes="member: 7183">I read the articles Danno and the feedback.This seems not be clear cut anymore and I am as confused as ever. Apart from the d5 the d500 seems to hold its own against anything else so in that respect no advantage to FX.Many people moan about size but that is precisely why I prefer dslr to mirrowless as I don't like smaller bodies of nearly all of them. It don't bother me at all to carry round a dslr all day and in my world bigger is better. Point and shoot for social and dslr for everything else including vacations. If it don't fit in your pocket what difference does it make about size. And as for the street shooting thing well I tried it with a d3100 and a Sony RX100 and it made no difference, a man with a camera is a man with a camera. And if you look to get street portraits you get hardly any negative no's if you have a dslr. Sorry, way off topic lol.Does anyone have a d500 yet?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="DaveW, post: 579105, member: 7183"] I read the articles Danno and the feedback. This seems not be clear cut anymore and I am as confused as ever. Apart from the d5 the d500 seems to hold its own against anything else so in that respect no advantage to FX. Many people moan about size but that is precisely why I prefer dslr to mirrowless as I don't like smaller bodies of nearly all of them. It don't bother me at all to carry round a dslr all day and in my world bigger is better. Point and shoot for social and dslr for everything else including vacations. If it don't fit in your pocket what difference does it make about size. And as for the street shooting thing well I tried it with a d3100 and a Sony RX100 and it made no difference, a man with a camera is a man with a camera. And if you look to get street portraits you get hardly any negative no's if you have a dslr. Sorry, way off topic lol. Does anyone have a d500 yet? [/QUOTE]

Verification