Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D810
Problems with D810 RAW files! (solved)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="PaulPosition" data-source="post: 334913" data-attributes="member: 25700"><p><strong>Re: Defective D810!!! Corrupt RAW files</strong></p><p></p><p>.dng is NOT raw anymore than tiff is. As a matter of fact, .dng is tiff with a different header and some Adobe tweaks.</p><p></p><p>Both format make good "digital negatives", with support for as much bit depth (12, 14...) as provided by NEF, but there's one big difference : they're RGB while a raw file is, sorta, RGBG until it's been "de-bayered" during conversion to other format. </p><p></p><p>Now I'm not saying there's ANY advantage at all(*) to having Bayer-pattern files over RGB ones, just pointing out the difference.</p><p></p><p>(*) Maybe there's one : some other thread talks about up-sizing raw files before post-processing for better resolution and it *may* have to do with it being done before the red-green-blue-green array gets interpolated into standard RGB values...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="PaulPosition, post: 334913, member: 25700"] [b]Re: Defective D810!!! Corrupt RAW files[/b] .dng is NOT raw anymore than tiff is. As a matter of fact, .dng is tiff with a different header and some Adobe tweaks. Both format make good "digital negatives", with support for as much bit depth (12, 14...) as provided by NEF, but there's one big difference : they're RGB while a raw file is, sorta, RGBG until it's been "de-bayered" during conversion to other format. Now I'm not saying there's ANY advantage at all(*) to having Bayer-pattern files over RGB ones, just pointing out the difference. (*) Maybe there's one : some other thread talks about up-sizing raw files before post-processing for better resolution and it *may* have to do with it being done before the red-green-blue-green array gets interpolated into standard RGB values... [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D810
Problems with D810 RAW files! (solved)
Top
