Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
Pro vs. General Lenses
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Retro" data-source="post: 421536" data-attributes="member: 37517"><p>My OP was about the expensive and so-called pro lenses, 14 - 24mm, 24 - 70mm, and 70 - 200mm, with more refined f-stops, vs. the cheaper, more versatile zooms, such as the 24 - 120mm lenses, with less restrictive f-stops, and you said you won't own mediocre glass. I wasn't referring to a cheap Sigma.</p><p></p><p>Someone new to photography, with a lot of money to spend, will go for a lens that offers the most freedom, and not understand the difference in lenses.</p><p></p><p>As another member here recently said: </p><p>"...<span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'arial'">but if I see a "semi/pro" shooting with a DX camera, I lose respect for them. sorry, but I feel that if you're a semi/pro, you should be using FX cameras. and it goes without saying no variable aperture lenses. Im still on the fence on how I feel about F/4 gear. but its not leaning towards positive."</span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'arial'"></span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'arial'">When looking through the list of Nikkor lenses, it seemed that the line drawn in the above quote was between the lenses I asked about. I asked because I want to know more about this kind of preference, and whether I might agree with it. </span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Retro, post: 421536, member: 37517"] My OP was about the expensive and so-called pro lenses, 14 - 24mm, 24 - 70mm, and 70 - 200mm, with more refined f-stops, vs. the cheaper, more versatile zooms, such as the 24 - 120mm lenses, with less restrictive f-stops, and you said you won't own mediocre glass. I wasn't referring to a cheap Sigma. Someone new to photography, with a lot of money to spend, will go for a lens that offers the most freedom, and not understand the difference in lenses. As another member here recently said: "...[SIZE=3][FONT=arial]but if I see a "semi/pro" shooting with a DX camera, I lose respect for them. sorry, but I feel that if you're a semi/pro, you should be using FX cameras. and it goes without saying no variable aperture lenses. Im still on the fence on how I feel about F/4 gear. but its not leaning towards positive." When looking through the list of Nikkor lenses, it seemed that the line drawn in the above quote was between the lenses I asked about. I asked because I want to know more about this kind of preference, and whether I might agree with it. [/FONT][/SIZE] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
Pro vs. General Lenses
Top