Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Horoscope Fish" data-source="post: 421527" data-attributes="member: 13090">I never said anything about the 24-120mm f/4 so I'm not sure where that's coming from and, actually, I have no real feeling's about that particular lens one way or the other. Further, I currently own very little Nikon glass. Some Nikon glass is extraordinary but I think most of it way over-priced for the performance offered. Third party manufacturers have stepped up their game over the past several years and makers like Sigma, Tokina and Tamron are turning out some magnificent lenses.As for what goes in the bag, that depends on the needs for your shooting style. I get by just fine with one wide-angle, two fast primes (35mm f/1.4 &amp; 85mm f/1.8) and one medium zoom (70-200mm f/2.8). If I had to (and I have in the past) I could get by nicely with the two primes all by themselves; though I'd sorely miss the compression I get from the 70-200mm.....</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Horoscope Fish, post: 421527, member: 13090"] I never said anything about the 24-120mm f/4 so I'm not sure where that's coming from and, actually, I have no real feeling's about that particular lens one way or the other. Further, I currently own very little Nikon glass. Some Nikon glass is extraordinary but I think most of it way over-priced for the performance offered. Third party manufacturers have stepped up their game over the past several years and makers like Sigma, Tokina and Tamron are turning out some magnificent lenses. As for what goes in the bag, that depends on the needs for your shooting style. I get by just fine with one wide-angle, two fast primes (35mm f/1.4 & 85mm f/1.8) and one medium zoom (70-200mm f/2.8). If I had to (and I have in the past) I could get by nicely with the two primes all by themselves; though I'd sorely miss the compression I get from the 70-200mm. [COLOR="#FFFFFF"]....[/COLOR] [/QUOTE]

Verification