Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Prime
Primes vs Telephoto lenses
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jay_dean" data-source="post: 679567" data-attributes="member: 34040"><p>I've had a Nikon 500mm f/4 VR for a few years and used to have the Siggy 150-600mm Sport which i bought on a whim with a bonus i received to cover that missing focal length. Theres not a big gap between them optically tbh, its the speed thats the more noticeable thing. And notice i said 'used to have', just saying<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jay_dean, post: 679567, member: 34040"] I've had a Nikon 500mm f/4 VR for a few years and used to have the Siggy 150-600mm Sport which i bought on a whim with a bonus i received to cover that missing focal length. Theres not a big gap between them optically tbh, its the speed thats the more noticeable thing. And notice i said 'used to have', just saying;) [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Prime
Primes vs Telephoto lenses
Top