Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="SkvLTD" data-source="post: 414937" data-attributes="member: 12855">[USER=37392]@maddog[/USER] 7100 won't be miles above and beyond 3200 in image quality, so you might as well go ahead with the lens. With any wildlife, the longer the better almost always, so I'd aim for the 150-600 or the 300 prime for utmost image quality.I had a similar debate with upgrading my tele zoom, but I also do sports, indoor events, etc where 70-200 proves much more versatile, especially being a 2.8. I've only managed some grasshoppers with it since getting it, and I had to crop 20% of the whole image for those little guys, so the reach for wildlife is mediocre at best. I'm also a bit hesitant to drop money on a teleconverter since a more suitable older lens would cost about as much.</blockquote>