Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Pretzel" data-source="post: 308447" data-attributes="member: 12257">Day 138 - PARTY!Took my boy to an end of school get-together tonight, and caught one of those rare smiling moments before he saw me with the camera. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" />&nbsp; Threatened him with putting this one on Facebook.&nbsp; HA![ATTACH=full]90036[/ATTACH]Then, since we were back there, it seemed like a good time to catch one of the hibiscus blooms against the background of the freshly cleaned patio.&nbsp; Did my own version of focus stacking (as a learning experience) with 2 handheld shots.&nbsp; One shot was focused more on the leaves, one on the &quot;internals&quot;.&nbsp; Both were at f2.8, so there's not a TON of depth to the focus stacking, but it definitely made a difference![ATTACH=full]90035[/ATTACH]</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Pretzel, post: 308447, member: 12257"] Day 138 - PARTY! Took my boy to an end of school get-together tonight, and caught one of those rare smiling moments before he saw me with the camera. ;) Threatened him with putting this one on Facebook. HA! [ATTACH type="full" width="60%"]90036._xfImport[/ATTACH] Then, since we were back there, it seemed like a good time to catch one of the hibiscus blooms against the background of the freshly cleaned patio. Did my own version of focus stacking (as a learning experience) with 2 handheld shots. One shot was focused more on the leaves, one on the "internals". Both were at f2.8, so there's not a TON of depth to the focus stacking, but it definitely made a difference! [ATTACH type="full" width="60%"]90035._xfImport[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]

Verification