Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="wornish" data-source="post: 337324" data-attributes="member: 15434">My &quot;two penneth&quot; being a Yorkshire man.When it comes to IQ the glass matters most and none of the mirrorless have any lens that approaches the legacy glass of the DSLR manufacturers in terms of resolution,&nbsp; just look at DxO lens tests or any other review you choose.&nbsp; Big glass wins.(Yes you can put big glass on mirrorless bodies but you save what 400 grams in body weight and have an unbalanced camera.When it comes to sensors size matters - its just Physics / Optics.&nbsp; To match FX you need an FX size mirrorless sensor, same with DX or Micro 4/3.When it come to speed of AF-S and focus tracking then none of the mirrorless can match the speed of the DSLR's (Nikon 1 may be the exception) today. In any review Sony, Fuji, Olympus or whoever can't compete with a DSLR.&nbsp; Yes they are getting better but not there yetThe latest Sony A7s&nbsp; at 12.2 MP is probably the leading camera in terms of low light capability - no DSLR can touch it.So Yes mirrorless is getting better but it still can't give the overall experience of a DSLR - yet.Times will change as technology moves on.&nbsp; I am still waiting for the definitive mirrorless camera and will change when they deliver better results than a DSLR can.If its just the weight thing then thats why I use the Nikon 1 as my walk about but not as a serious DSLR replacement.Everyone has their own criteria, but I certainly don't right off&nbsp; the quality you can get out of a DSLR.....&nbsp; &nbsp; legacy has a lot going for it.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="wornish, post: 337324, member: 15434"] My "two penneth" being a Yorkshire man. When it comes to IQ the glass matters most and none of the mirrorless have any lens that approaches the legacy glass of the DSLR manufacturers in terms of resolution, just look at DxO lens tests or any other review you choose. Big glass wins. (Yes you can put big glass on mirrorless bodies but you save what 400 grams in body weight and have an unbalanced camera. When it comes to sensors size matters - its just Physics / Optics. To match FX you need an FX size mirrorless sensor, same with DX or Micro 4/3. When it come to speed of AF-S and focus tracking then none of the mirrorless can match the speed of the DSLR's (Nikon 1 may be the exception) today. In any review Sony, Fuji, Olympus or whoever can't compete with a DSLR. Yes they are getting better but not there yet The latest Sony A7s at 12.2 MP is probably the leading camera in terms of low light capability - no DSLR can touch it. So Yes mirrorless is getting better but it still can't give the overall experience of a DSLR - yet. Times will change as technology moves on. I am still waiting for the definitive mirrorless camera and will change when they deliver better results than a DSLR can. If its just the weight thing then thats why I use the Nikon 1 as my walk about but not as a serious DSLR replacement. Everyone has their own criteria, but I certainly don't right off the quality you can get out of a DSLR..... legacy has a lot going for it. [/QUOTE]

Verification