Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Photography
Post your "Product Photography" Big or Small.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kodiak" data-source="post: 181355" data-attributes="member: 15426"><p>Alright "mr2_serious",</p><p></p><p>At fist glance, I recognize a high sense for plasticity when it come to light, colours</p><p>and materials. The fourth element of the equation, organization, you seem to have</p><p>neglected or ignored in some of the presented parts of your portfolio. At fist glance,</p><p>as well, I think I have detected two perfect and impeccable posts! Let's go deeper:</p><p></p><p></p><p>[ATTACH]46483[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>This chess board is a very good idea. The plasticities of light, colours and materials</p><p>are all working together to achieve a captivating, strong static composition. The fourth </p><p>element of the equation, organization, the one that makes good to perfect is missing:</p><p>• The figures are all sharper at the top then they are at the bottom</p><p>• The alignment of the figures to the chessboard could be improved</p><p>• The chessboard itself is improperly aligned</p><p>[ATTACH]46484[/ATTACH]</p><p>Yes, this one is technically correct. At the same time, the less appealing.</p><p>A good catalogue shot.</p><p>[ATTACH]46485[/ATTACH]</p><p>Associated, normally, to these products are ideas like warmth, pleasure, relaxation…</p><p>None of these is reflected here. Another great catalogue shot.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>[ATTACH]46486[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>This is the first time you were working against yourself! The selection of a darker coloured</p><p>background would have made this take a hit! Else than the alignment of the top rotor and</p><p>the background, everything is perfect. I am not considering the landing gear misalignment </p><p>because this is a minor detail. The actual background does not bring up the shape and the </p><p>features of the rotor blades.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>[ATTACH]46487[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>Absolutely! This one is PERFECT! Here, all four elements of the equation are working together!</p><p>Clean, detailed, correct specular expression and layout.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>[ATTACH]46488[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>This last one is my favourite. Two details only took the word perfect from it, and this is, again,</p><p>the fourth element of the equation: organization. Here, this is translated in the fact that there</p><p>is not enough water in the second (red) glass, and the first (amber) is slightly too far apart!</p><p>Everything else is perfect: light, colours, and materials are all working together! Beautiful!</p><p></p><p>•••</p><p>This is the kind of report I would write to my students. They know me! I am hard but fair! I do</p><p>hope that this was constructive enough assuring you that I do not practice any other way.</p><p></p><p>Have a good day…</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kodiak, post: 181355, member: 15426"] Alright "mr2_serious", At fist glance, I recognize a high sense for plasticity when it come to light, colours and materials. The fourth element of the equation, organization, you seem to have neglected or ignored in some of the presented parts of your portfolio. At fist glance, as well, I think I have detected two perfect and impeccable posts! Let's go deeper: [ATTACH=CONFIG]46483[/ATTACH] This chess board is a very good idea. The plasticities of light, colours and materials are all working together to achieve a captivating, strong static composition. The fourth element of the equation, organization, the one that makes good to perfect is missing: • The figures are all sharper at the top then they are at the bottom • The alignment of the figures to the chessboard could be improved • The chessboard itself is improperly aligned [ATTACH=CONFIG]46484[/ATTACH] Yes, this one is technically correct. At the same time, the less appealing. A good catalogue shot. [ATTACH=CONFIG]46485[/ATTACH] Associated, normally, to these products are ideas like warmth, pleasure, relaxation… None of these is reflected here. Another great catalogue shot. [ATTACH=CONFIG]46486[/ATTACH] This is the first time you were working against yourself! The selection of a darker coloured background would have made this take a hit! Else than the alignment of the top rotor and the background, everything is perfect. I am not considering the landing gear misalignment because this is a minor detail. The actual background does not bring up the shape and the features of the rotor blades. [ATTACH=CONFIG]46487[/ATTACH] Absolutely! This one is PERFECT! Here, all four elements of the equation are working together! Clean, detailed, correct specular expression and layout. [ATTACH=CONFIG]46488[/ATTACH] This last one is my favourite. Two details only took the word perfect from it, and this is, again, the fourth element of the equation: organization. Here, this is translated in the fact that there is not enough water in the second (red) glass, and the first (amber) is slightly too far apart! Everything else is perfect: light, colours, and materials are all working together! Beautiful! ••• This is the kind of report I would write to my students. They know me! I am hard but fair! I do hope that this was constructive enough assuring you that I do not practice any other way. Have a good day… [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Photography
Post your "Product Photography" Big or Small.
Top
